John the Revelator

“John the Revelator” has been one of my favorite Depeche Mode songs ever since I first heard it on Playing the Angel (which also happens to be my favorite Depeche Mode album [yes, I’m not quite a Gen-X’er]).

For the fun of it, I was reading about the song today and came across this amazing unofficial video:

I love that the video really highlights the transgressive nature of the Depeche Mode re-interpretation of the “traditional” version of “John the Revelator,” which has a much more religious tone. (Not that the Depeche Mode version isn’t religious — but it’s anti-religious, if anything.) Showing George W. Bush as an evil version of John the Revelator is just awesome.

In addition to that awesome video, the CD single for “John the Revelator” is pretty great, too. The UNKLE remix is my favorite, but Tiefschwarz does nice straightforward and dub versions of the song, too.

Finally, the official version of the video is nice too… it captures the spirit of their “Touring the Angel” tour (which I didn’t see in person but have a DVD of…):

Seattle Tunnel On Weekends

Currently, the Seattle Metro Bus Tunnel is only open on weekdays from 5 a.m. to 7 p.m. These hours mean that I rarely use the tunnel. Most of my non-work bus riding is on the weekends or night after 7 p.m.

The good news is that once the tunnel starts having the light rail go to-and-from the airport, the tunnel will be open on the weekends!

I sent feedback and got this response from Sound Transit:

When Link light rail starts operating, the tunnel will be open on weekends. Passengers will be able to travel from downtown Seattle direct to the Airport.

This is awesome. I hope that busses will also use the tunnel on the weekends — it makes for a much more consistent and less confusing transit system (which is always a Good Thing in my book!).

UPDATE 10.08.07
It looks like whether the busses run in the tunnel on the weekends is still up in the air:

The 2009 rail operations plan calls for the tunnel to be open weekends and also late at night during the week. KCM bus operations will have to decide if they wish to run but we at Sound Transit plan to run the train week ends and to continue to use the tunnel.

Gay in Iran

After all the discussion about being gay in Iran following Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s comment about there being no gay people in Iran, I found this Newsweek interview with a gay Iranian (who left Iran for the U.S.) interesting and thought it was worth sharing.

One part of the interview especially struck me. The man says:

It’s not easy for everybody to get out of that situation. Especially right now, it’s very difficult for Iranians to leave Iran: they cannot get visas to different countries. They just have to deal with the situation, lead a secret life and tell lies all the time …

I never realized that the U.S. war on terror and all sorts of diplomatic restrictions (denying visas, travel, etc.) against certain countries are making it even more difficult for people in these (often Islamic and religious and extremely conservative) countries — not only economically, but also when it comes to progressive social change.

I’m not sure what the ideal situation is, but the specific case of gay people desiring to leave their super-religious conservative countries never occured to me.

Yossi & Jagger

Yossi and JaggerI tend to dislike films that fall into the “Gay and Lesbian” genre. They are usually either really unrealistic a la (straight) romantic comedies or overly dramatic or too simple and straightforward (thus not really investigating deeper themes that “straight” movies might delve into [and I think part of this is because the “Gay and Lesbian” film genre is only 20 years old]) or just “too gay” (which I hate to even say since I get annoyed with gay people who complain about “gay culture” being too flamboyant or sexual or whatever [and I therefore see “too gay” as a combination of self-hate and stereotyping]), but the Israeli film Yossi & Jagger is one of those rare gay films that transcend that “Gay and Lesbian” genre.

The film (which is apparently based on a true story) mostly follows two soldiers in the Israeli army. The fact I say “mostly follows” is perhaps the first indicator that this is more than just a “Gay and Lesbian” movie. While Yossi and Jagger’s love story (which has already been established so this isn’t one of those “finding the right one” movies, either) is the dominant narrative of the film, it also captures the isolation of a military posted somewhere on the outskirts of civilization (in this case the Lebanon/Israel border) as well as the other strange relationships (thus showing that Yossi and Jagger’s situation is just one of many slightly less-than-fully-functional/ideal interpersonal relationships) that develop in small, isolated communities.

Example 1: Some woman in the army is basically something of a pleasure woman for the colonel who comes to visit the outpost on occasion. Example 2: Yaeli, who has a crush on Jagger despite the fairly obvious fact he’s gay and/or with Yossi, who one of the other soldiers in turn has a crush on and mistakes an interaction between Yaeli and Jagger to be some budding relationship.

In addition to relationships, the film also touches on the nature of military life (close quarters, no access to movies, fighting for something you don’t fully understand/agree with, crappy food, etc.) including gayness in the military. At one point some soldiers are making jokes about “faggots in Tel Aviv” and then Jagger asks them how they’d react if he told them he was a faggot. They said something like, “Well you are pretty so we’d all be after you” and everyone laughed. (So basically, gay soldiers aren’t as much a problem for the actual people on the ground but more of a problem for civilians on the outside.)

If you don’t want the outcome of the movie spoiled, stop reading here… because my favorite scene was actually the final one.

After an ambush that goes horribly wrong (the area was laced with mines/explosives it seems) Jagger is killed. Yossi finally tells Jagger that he loves him and even shows his affection for Jagger in front of other soldiers/officers.

When the group of soldiers goes to visit Jagger’s family to pay their respects, Yaeli basically tells Jagger’s mother that she loved Jagger and she tried to tell him the day he died that she had feelings for him but didn’t get a chance and that she knew that Jagger felt the same way. The camera kept cutting over to Yossi who can really do nothing as Yaeli basically hijacks Jagger’s memory with her own unrequited love story. I found this especially fascinating because I’ve noticed that when people die, everyone seems to want to project some part of themselves onto the memory of the person and sort of replaces that person’s existence (which I guess is over since they are dead) with all of these co-opted memories.

Finally Jagger’s mom makes some comment about how she didn’t know her son at all: she didn’t know he had a girlfriend, she doesn’t know his favorite movie, and she doesn’t know his favorite song. Throughout the film Jagger is constantly making up funny lyrics to this song by some Israeli singer named Rita (who seems to be something of an Israeli gay icon a la Madonna for American gays). Yossi is able to tell Jagger’s mom what her son’s favorite song is, thus reclaiming his own part of Jagger’s memory.

Pretending To Be Blind

Strange that in season 2 of both Dynasty and Smallville someone is blinded by some traumatic event only to have their sight return but keeps it secret and continues pretending to be blind to see the true intentions of those around them. Both Lionel Luther and Blake Carrington fake their blindness.

I’m not saying that the trope of a using a blind person for literary/storyline purposes is strange… going way back to Oedipus, for example, the “blind” Oedipus often “sees” (in a metaphysical sense) the truth of a situation better than the sighted people around him.

What is interesting, I think, is that in both of these shows I love and am watching/recently watched, a person who loses their sight continues to pretend to be blind in order to “see” the world around him better. Lionel is able to see the truth behind various plans that Lex develops and Blake is able to figure out what exactly is going on in the Krystle-Nick Toscanni-Falon love triangle.

Basically what I’m trying to get at is that this is an interesting technique since it basically gives the characters get the advantages that frequently come with blindness in literature (i.e. “seeing” better/more in-depth) as well as a sort of double-vision where they see people’s true nature since those people assume the character is blind.

EMP: Not Electronic-Friendly

I went to the Experience Music Project for the third time yesterday. The first time I loved the exhibit about the history of alternative music (or so I recall that’s what it was about — in particular I remember a special mini-section about the Minnesota music scene which I found awesome and validated my love for bands like Babes in Toyland [the original bassist went to my high school]). But the first time I went was in 1998 and my musical interests have changed a lot since then.

Despite looking all cool and futuristic, the museum is pretty stuck-in-the-past.

Okay, I take that back. When it comes to hip-hop music, the museum is surprisingly progressive. It actually acknowledges hip-hop as a valid music style and even has a featured exhibit called Yes Yes Y’all: The First Decade of Hip-Hop. It’s cool. Hip-hop artists and history is also featured prominently in the Sound and Vision: Artists Tell Their Stories permanent exhibit.

But when it comes to electronic music, there is nothing. The most electronic artist I could find featured was Afrika Bambaataa. There were a few things about DJing but it was all in the context of how that’s related to hip-hop and whatnot.

So while I want to say, “The EMP doesn’t have electronic music because it’s mostly just a rock ‘n’ roll museum,” the inclusion of all the hip-hop stuff (which is awesome, don’t get me wrong!!) shows that the museum wants to be more than just rock ‘n’ roll.

I guess there are two explanations for why there is such a blatant lack of electronic representation: one innocent reason and one more sinister.

Innocent: Electronic music could be considered even more recent than hip-hop music. A lot of the ideology behind electronic music and the DJ culture around it comes directly from hip-hop.

Sinister: Electronic isn’t considered “genuine” enough or “valid” enough as a musical genre. Maybe the curators think that it’s too trendy and isn’t going to last?

Most likely, the truth lies somewhere between those two explanations. But it’s still unfortunate. Imagine the Sound Lab with some more interesting keyboards and turntables and computers used for mixing electronic music. That would be awesome.

Or instead of the Guitar Gallery, how awesome would a gallery of the history of electronic instruments be??? Last weekend my friend Justin performed in the Seattle premier of Turangalîla. There was a very interesting instrument called ondes Martenot. I would love to see and learn more about proto-electronic instruments like this and the EMP with its Frank Gehry design and attached Science Fiction Museum seems like the perfect place.

Perhaps in a few years something will change. I do intend to send this feedback to the EMP and will of course post an update if I hear anything back.

Masks Are The New Black

Recently I’ve noticed that masks are the new cool thing to wear. Animal masks, in particular.

Exhibit A:
Fox N’ Wolf performing “In Yr Underwear”:

and

Exhibit B:
The Bat For Lashes video “What’s A Girl To Do”:

Exhibit C (my favorite):
Last night at the ridiculously awesome Institubes Paris Terror Club show a bunch of the DJs were wearing animal masks:
DJs wearing masks

(On a side note: the concert was absolutely amazing… Surkin and Curses! totally blew me away. There was silly string, hella dancing, “Hungry 4 Love,” the Switch remix of Nine Inch Nail’s “Capital G,” some Klaxons remixes, Boys Noize‘s “& Down,” animal masks, and a bunch of other stuff that I was too drunk to remember! It might beat out Soulwax’s show as my favorite event at Chop Suey.)

So what does this animal mask trend mean? Honestly, I don’t have any theories yet but I’d love to hear others.

Atomic

The Atomic Bomb
It never occured to me that the US bombing of Japan during World War II probably resulted in the most people dying simultaneously (or within a rather short amount of time) in the history of humanity.

I just watched the documentary White Light, Black Rain. Despite knowing “about the bomb” and “about the situation,” I never really knew what happened immediately after and hear first-hand from survivors what it was like. It’s difficult to imagine or put into perspective the deaths of 210,000 human beings, but this documentary does a an excellent job trying to capture such an ineffable situation.

Final Step of Evolution = Creating a New Reality?

The television show Heroes got me to thinking about the evolution of humans. At one point in the unaired poilot, Mohinder talks about constant minute changes in the human genome and suggest that teleportation, etc. might not be that far off.

But really, so far as I know, the “biological” aspect of a living organism doesn’t really have the ability to affect things at that sort of (I don’t know if this is the correct term?) sub-atomic level. Teleportation, if scientists ever figure it out, is, I would imagine, extremely complicated and will probably involve lots of machines and whatnot to accomplish. I somehow doubt that if we ever do learn how to teleport, that it would involve any sort of manipulation of DNA or something of that sort.

What I am wondering is what if the definition of “evolving the ability to teleport” actually means that humankind creates an artifical world and basically wires everyone into that world (a la The Matrix) and so that new world where the laws of science and physics allow humans to teleport replaces the “old” world.

This idea also came to me via an interview on Countdown With Keith Olberman the other week. Basically, this philosopher/scientist named Nick Bostrom supports this idea (and it’s nothing new, of course) called the simulation hypothesis which suggests that our entire reality could be a “game” or “creation” or something of that sort of a creature who may in turn have multiple worlds and/or lives in a society where others may have multiple worlds.

So my question is: What if the final step of evolution is evolving out of the need to evolve? That is, instead of progressing our human mids/bodies we replace everything we know and create a world where we can continue to evolve without the constraints of the universe we inhabit. For all we know, our existence right now is the evolution of previous beings whose universe had sub-atomic particules with completely different traits than those in our current reality.

Something to think about, eh?