New Design

I’m not sure how “known” this is, but as far as I am concerned, this blog still isn’t “live” or “official” yet. When I decided to start blogging again back in April, I guess I didn’t make this explicit, but it’s sorta been something I’ve known.

What does this mean? I’m not sure. But I do know that one of the first steps to making Double Reading “official” was to come up with a new and completely different design. So I can now check that off of the list.

I swear, I have been stressing out about the design since I started in April. I have folders upon folders on my hard drive with all my attempts at coming up with something I would be happy with. I learned a lot about Photoshop on the way here, and drew inspiration from a lot of places. Eventually I will get a page (the colophon) that will describe the process a little more in depth.

So where does that leave things as far as becoming “official” and open to the public? Pretty damn close. I want to write up that colophon mentioned above, get some sort of “About Jason” page written up (photos included!), tweak the design a little more (I already see a few things I want to change/improve)… and then it might actually be time.

Please please please give me feedback on the new design. Just don’t say, “It’s too busy.” I intentionally decided to go with a “maximalist” look rather than the trendy minimalist/clean design (though I do think that below the header things are pretty clean).

Serenity Just Now

Serenity logo
(I was joking the other day about how nearly every article I’ve read about the new Joss Whedon movie Serenity somehow incorporates the phrase “serenity now!” in the headline… and now here I am hopping on the bandwagon. Oh well.)

Thanks to Ahe’s mini-review of Serenity earlier in my blog, I’ve been eagerly awaiting the movie’s release. I wasn’t a hardcore-enough fan to go see it opening night, but I did catch it this afternoon, and I must say that I thoroughly loved it.

I am curious, however, about the reaction of people who didn’t watch Firefly the television show. While the movie does, for the most part, stand on its own, as Ahe noted:

… you don’t need to have seen the series to understand what’s going on, although, it does help… especially since two of the characters are basically no longer part of the crew… you understand who they *were* and why they matter.

There are two deaths in the film. One of them was ho-hum for me, but the second one was a pretty big deal. And I’m not sure that the second one would have been a big deal had I not known that person via the television show. (The first character’s death is somewhat expected since that character was pretty minor in the television show, as well.)

Slate had an article the other day, “Joss Whedon: Why he should stick to television,” that I must say I agree with wholeheartedly. Although that headline sorta suggests that the writer (Seth Stevenson) thought Serenity sucked, that’s not the case. Like Ahe’s point above, Stevenson notes that without the emotional background given by the television show, the movie isn’t quite the same.

In one of the last posts on my old website, I wrote about “The Joys of Mythology.” Here are some relevant excerpts:

the deeper and more complex something is, the more rewarding it is to be totally immersed in it… david lynch has said that he loves doing television shows (despite the fact that they always get canceled [see twin peaks, on the air, and hotel room]) because he doesn’t like the two or three hour time you have in films. he likes to create the universe and play there. he likes the stories.

Basically, I wish that filmmakers like Whedon and Lynch would follow Stevenson’s advice and, rather than make films in which they have to cut out a lot of richness, tried pitching some ideas to HBO or something instead of ruthless networks that cancel their shows prematurely and without mercy. As much as I loved the film version of Mulholland Drive, I cannot help but wonder what would’ve happened in the world Lynch created had ABC picked up the pilot. (Back story: Mulholland Drive originally started off as a pilot television show — approximately the first hour-and-a-half/two-hours of the movie. After ABC decided they didn’t want the show, the French company Canal Plus decided to give Lynch the money he needed to finish the film.)

Since it’s too late for shows like Buffy, Angel, and Firefly, I guess the best we can hope for are more movies. Things were left pretty wide open at the end of Serenity, and I am willing to bet that Whedon is already working on a sequel (now let’s hope that the film makes enough money to convince the studios that it’d be a worthwhile investment).

So I would recommend checking out Serenity — even if you haven’t watched Firefly. After seeing the movie I can almost guarantee that you will want to go back and checkout the series on DVD. The two together create an emotionally rich and complex world that is truly worth experiencing.

S-H-A-M-E-L-E-S-S

A Dirty Shame
I’ve been a fan of John Waters ever since my friend Dan sent me a video copy of Desperate Living back when I was in high school. Dan was a huge John Waters fan, and after experiencing the total fucked-up-ness of Desperate Living, I had to see more.

I’m not sure what order I watched things in, but I have since seen Pink Flamingos, Polyester, Serial Mom, Pecker, Cecil B. DeMented, and, now, A Dirty Shame. I guess you could say that ever since the totally grotesque and unbelievable chicken-fucking of Desperate Living, I’ve been addicted.

So as for A Dirty Shame, I’m not going to do a full-fledged Jason-type review. All I can say is that it is great and that, depending on who you are, I recommend it. This film is definitely “John Waters-esque.” For sure more so than his recent movies like Cecil B. DeMented and Pecker. Very disgusting and sexual. And, in a way, somewhat political. I’m not sure how, but Waters totally confronts the anti-sex movement (is there one, though??), but I’m not sure how.

I want to say that A Dirty Shame exposes hypocrisy or something, but I’m not sure it does. If nothing else, it strongly emphasizes the fact that everyone is a sexual creature and that no fetish (i.e. humping strangers’ legs, vomiting on your partner, rubbing food on your “private parts,” getting off on licking dirt, etc.) is too abnormal or strange and that everyone has a little kinkiness in them.

This is, obviously, a very pro-sex movie, but more than that, it’s a pro-sex movie! I mean, more than sex as something to turn people on and get you off, but sex as in a way to get in touch with your inner-self and explore life and all of that. Although there is nudity and “disgusting stuff” in the film, I actually think it’s pretty tame and that its message is pretty simple: Sex is good.

I wish I could say that Walters’s is pushing all sorts of boundaries, but I’m not sure he is. I think I’ve read this in other reviews, but in an age of cinema where sex is as common as condoms, it’s hard to be really artistic and edgy. Sure, A Dirty Shame is way more out-there sexually than Pecker and Cecil B. Demented, but it’s still sorta cute in its message. And not too shocking. Nothing violent, nothing too extreme — just good, ol’ fashioned kinky sex!